|
Since
emotional processing was described in 1980 by
Rachman, it has been referred to in the literature but not researched in
its own right to any great extent. It has not seen the sort of
exponential growth as cognitive theories have, either in experimental or clinical
realms. However, emotion and cognition are similarly inferred mental
states. Does this represent, as Thomas Scheff argued (1984), a
sort of scientific taboo or wariness about emotion research; is cognition
just more important and interesting to researchers; or are
there major scientific shortcomings, vagueness and wooliness inherent in
the concepts of emotion and emotional processing?
Click
below to go to:
A theory of
the not
Not another concept of processing!
Emotional processing and disorders; Cause or
effect?
'Looking forward to ill health?' by
Professor Peter Thomas
Does the
concept of emotional processing commit the
fallacy of tautology?
References
'Science is built up of facts, as a house
is built up of stones;
but an accumulation of facts is no more a science
than a heap of stones is a house'
Henri Princaré 1905
|